2009年金融时报全球MBA排名
本条目包含过多不是中文的内容，欢迎协助翻译。
若已有相当内容译为中文，可迳自去除本模板。
2009年《金融时报》全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA rankings 2009 )
目录 |
2009年1月26日英国《金融时报》发布了2009年全球MBA百强排名榜，宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院、伦敦商学院、哈佛商学院位列前三，中国首次有商学院入围前十，中欧国际工商学院名列第八，并连续六年蝉联亚洲第一。
《金融时报》这份榜单显示，排在第四至第十名的商学院分别是哥伦比亚大学商学院、欧洲工商管理学院(INSEAD)、斯坦福商学院、西班牙企业学院(IEBS)、中欧国际工商学院、麻省理工斯隆管理学院和纽约大学斯特恩商学院。
中国另有香港科技大学商学院进入该榜单全球百强，名列第16位。
TABLE KEY (weights are in brackets)
Audit year Indicates the most recent year that KPMG audited a business school, applying specified audit procedures relating to selected data provided for the Financial Times MBA ranking.
Salary today The average alumni salary three years after graduation. (The 2009 ranking surveyed the MBA class that graduated in 2005). This figure includes alumni salary data for the current year and the one or two preceding years, where available. The figure is NOT used in the ranking.
Weighted salary (20) The average alumni salary today with adjustment for salary variations between industry sectors. This figure includes data for the current year and the one or two preceding years where available.
Salary percentage increase (20) The percentage increase in average alumni salary from before the MBA to today as a percentage of the pre-MBA salary. This figure includes data for the current year and the one or two preceding years where available.
Value for money (3) This is calculated using the salary earned by alumni today, course length, fees and other costs, including the opportunity cost of not working for the duration of the course.
Career progress (3) This is calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of the company alumni are working in now versus before their MBA. Data for the current year and the one or two preceding years are included where available.
Aims achieved (3) The extent to which alumni fulfilled their goals or reasons for doing an MBA.
Placement success (2) Alumni who used the careers service at their business school were asked to rank its effectiveness in their job search. This figure includes data for the current year and the one or two preceding years where available.
Employed at three months (2) The percentage of the most recent graduating class that had found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of graduation. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the school was able to provide employment data.
Alumni recommend (2) Alumni were asked to name three business schools from which they would recruit MBA graduates. The ranking is calculated according to the votes for each school. Data for the current year and the one or two preceding years are included where available.
Women faculty (2) Percentage of female faculty.
Women students (2) Percentage of female students.
Women board (1) Percentage of female members of the advisory board.
International faculty (4) Percentage of faculty whose citizenship differs from their country of employment.
International students (4) Percentage of students whose citizenship differs from the country in which they are studying.
International board (2) Percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the country in which the business school is based.
International mobility (6) This is calculated according to whether alumni worked in different countries before the MBA, on graduation and also where they are employed today.
International experience (2) Weighted average of four criteria that measure international exposure during the MBA programme.
Languages (2) Number of extra languages required on completion of the MBA. Where a proportion of students requires a further language due to an additional diploma, that figure is included in the calculations but not presented in the final table.
Faculty with doctorates (5) Percentage of faculty with a doctoral degree.
FT doctoral rank (5) This is calculated according to the number of doctoral graduates from each business school during the past three years. Additional points are given if these doctoral graduates took up faculty positions at one of the top 50 full-time MBA schools of 2008.
FT research rank (10) This is calculated according to the number of faculty publications in 40 academic and practitioner journals. Points are awarded to the business school at which the author is currently employed. The total is weighted for faculty size.
Table Note:
Although the headline ranking figures show the changes in the survey year to year, the pattern of clustering among the schools is also significant. Some 195 points separate the top school from the school ranked 100 in the 2009 ranking. The top 10 schools, from the joint first London Business School and Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania to New York University: Stern, form the leading group of world class business schools. Some 31 points separate LBS and Wharton from Stern. The second group is headed by the University of Chicago: Booth which scored 57 points more than University of California at Berkeley: Haas, leader of the third group. The fourth group is headed by University of California at Irvine: Merage and includes schools ranked from 74 to 100.